On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 03:35:37PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Christoph! > > On 8/7/19 3:30 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > let me know what you think of this series. This drops the pretty much > > dead sn2 and hpsim support, which then allows us to build a single ia64 > > kernel image that supports all remaining systems without extra indirections > > in the fast path. > > Interesting. Does that mean Debian no longer needs to maintain two different > kernels for ia64, currently named "itanium" and "mckinley"? I don't think so. Assumeing one of them sets CONFIG_ITANIUM and the other just CONFIG_MCKINLEY, the first one already covers everything that the second can. But assuming both set CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC they should both get a little faster as a lot of indirect calls there just exist for SN2 are gone with this. And if my memory serves me right indirect calls have always been rather expensive on ia64 vs other architectures (at least before spectre mitigations made others slower as well). > > Adrian > > -- > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx > `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 ---end quoted text---
|