Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:25:09 +0200
- Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20190528101012.11402-1-chrubis@suse.cz> (Cyril Hrubis's message of "Tue, 28 May 2019 12:10:12 +0200")
- References: <20190528101012.11402-1-chrubis@suse.cz>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
On Mai 28 2019, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've tested the patch on i386. Before the patch calling bdflush() with
> attempt to tune a variable returned 0 and after the patch the syscall
> fails with EINVAL.
Should be ENOSYS, doesn't it?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
