Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:43:18 -0700
- Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20190415114209.GJ3366@dhcp22.suse.cz>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
- References: <20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20190226131201.GA10588@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190415114209.GJ3366@dhcp22.suse.cz>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
On 4/15/19 4:42 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via
>> tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm.
> It seems that Dave is busy. Let's add Andrew. Can we get this [1] merged
> finally, please?
Sorry these slipped through the cracks.
These look sane to me. Because it pokes around mm/page_alloc.c a bit,
and could impact other architectures, my preference would be for Andrew
to pick these up for -mm. But, I don't feel that strongly about it.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
