Re: [PATCH 14/15] arch: add split IPC system calls where needed
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arch: add split IPC system calls where needed
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:18:48 +0100
- Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux API <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx>, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, alpha <linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Parisc List <linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sparclinux <sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAK8P3a0uas76i2W1yjFvxHT-2=A8_egUZeAUM-Vya6386+87Xg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190110162435.309262-15-arnd@arndb.de> <87pnsz28k2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <CAK8P3a0uas76i2W1yjFvxHT-2=A8_egUZeAUM-Vya6386+87Xg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:01 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:59 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
> > > arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 12 ++++++++++++
> >
> > I have some changes I'd like to make to our syscall table that will
> > clash with this.
> >
> > I'll try and send them today.
>
> Ok. Are those for 5.0 or 5.1? If they are intended for 5.0, it would be
> nice for me to have a branch based on 5.0-rc1 that I can put
> the other patches on top of.
There is also another change that I considered:
At the end of my series, we have a lot of entries like
245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
245 64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
245 spu clock_settime sys_clock_settime
which could be folded into
245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
245 spu64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
if we just add another option to the ABI field. Any thoughts on
that?
Arnd
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]