Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number
> > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one
> > > > reason or another.
> > > >
> > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking
> > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps:
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > >
> > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all
> > > >   architectures but that we definitely want there.
> > >
> > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k.
> > > Is that intentional?
> >
> > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I
> > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with
> > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in
> > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both
> > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit
> > architectures, I can add that as well.
>
> Thanks, sounds fine to me.

Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should
add it?

     Arnd