Re: remove the ->mapping_error method from dma_map_ops V2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: remove the ->mapping_error method from dma_map_ops V2
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:41:17 +0100
- Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, robin.murphy@xxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20181123065511.GA17856@lst.de>
- References: <20181122140320.24080-1-hch@lst.de> <CAHk-=wh=_T=A53+o4zLNbKio43LGqVDb0KCbWPDvAg54bRDmWw@mail.gmail.com> <20181122170715.GI30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <CAHk-=wgfGzXuDAKFQPdzMib3QCRHfSTsy5=gLU-WCoya+Ym+1A@mail.gmail.com> <11829e3c-7302-f821-cf5c-863e5267a17b@arm.com> <CAHk-=whxf0zqutExPr_j1A625Z3gcL6k_ABzKo1BtzN4F93hkA@mail.gmail.com> <20181123065511.GA17856@lst.de>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 07:55:11AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 09:55:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > No, the big immediate benefit of allowing "return -EINVAL" etc is
> > simply legibility and error avoidance.
>
> Well, I can tweak the last patch to return -EINVAL from dma_mapping_error
> instead of the old 1 is as bool true. The callers should all be fine,
> although I'd have to audit them. Still wouldn't help with being able to
> return different errors.
Any opinions? I'd really like to make some forward progress on this
series.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]