Re: [RFC PATCH 04/29] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/29] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation.
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:31:49 +0200
- Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20180906073023.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz>
- References: <1536163184-26356-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1536163184-26356-5-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180906073023.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
On Thu 06-09-18 09:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep
>
> ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> obj-y += nobootmem.o
> else
> obj-y += bootmem.o
> endif
>
> behind?
I can see you have done so in an earlier patch. I have missed that.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
