Re: [PATCH 10/20] powerpc/dma-noncoherent: don't disable irqs over kmap_atomic

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>]

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:27:46AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 18:38 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The requirement to disable local irqs over kmap_atomic is long gone,
> > so remove those calls.
> 
> Really ? I'm trying to verify that and getting lost in a mess of macros
> from hell in the per-cpu stuff but if you look at our implementation
> of kmap_atomic_prot(), all it does is a preempt_disable(), and then
> it uses kmap_atomic_idx_push():
> 
> 	int idx = __this_cpu_inc_return(__kmap_atomic_idx) - 1;
> 
> Note the use of __this_cpu_inc_return(), not this_cpu_inc_return(),
> ie this is the non-interrupt safe version...

Looks like the powerpc variant indeed isn't save.

I did look a bit more through the code and history, and it seems
like we remove the need to disable irqs when called from process
context a while ago, but we still require disabling irqs when called
from irq context.  Given that this code can also be called from
irq context we'll have to keep the local_irq_save.