On 2018/8/14 17:28, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of dividing sizeof array with sizeof an element.
>> So just replace it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> This code is copied from binutils and we don't want to needlessly cause
> it to diverge from the binutils copy.
>
> So thanks but no thanks.
Thank you for clarification.
Sincerely
zhong jiang
> cheers
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
>> index ac2b55b..f3f57a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
>> @@ -966,8 +966,7 @@
>> { 0xff, 11, NULL, NULL, PPC_OPERAND_SIGNOPT },
>> };
>>
>> -const unsigned int num_powerpc_operands = (sizeof (powerpc_operands)
>> - / sizeof (powerpc_operands[0]));
>> +const unsigned int num_powerpc_operands = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_operands);
>>
>> /* The functions used to insert and extract complicated operands. */
>>
>> @@ -6980,8 +6979,7 @@
>> {"fcfidu.", XRC(63,974,1), XRA_MASK, POWER7|PPCA2, PPCVLE, {FRT, FRB}},
>> };
>>
>> -const int powerpc_num_opcodes =
>> - sizeof (powerpc_opcodes) / sizeof (powerpc_opcodes[0]);
>> +const int powerpc_num_opcodes = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_opcodes);
>>
>> /* The VLE opcode table.
>>
>> @@ -7219,8 +7217,7 @@
>> {"se_bl", BD8(58,0,1), BD8_MASK, PPCVLE, 0, {B8}},
>> };
>>
>> -const int vle_num_opcodes =
>> - sizeof (vle_opcodes) / sizeof (vle_opcodes[0]);
>> +const int vle_num_opcodes = ARRAY_SIZE(vle_opcodes);
>>
>> /* The macro table. This is only used by the assembler. */
>>
>> @@ -7288,5 +7285,4 @@
>> {"e_clrlslwi",4, PPCVLE, "e_rlwinm %0,%1,%3,(%2)-(%3),31-(%3)"},
>> };
>>
>> -const int powerpc_num_macros =
>> - sizeof (powerpc_macros) / sizeof (powerpc_macros[0]);
>> +const int powerpc_num_macros = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_macros);
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
> .
>
|