Re: [PATCH 4/5] Expand the INIT_SIGNALS and INIT_SIGHAND macros and remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, David Howells wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >  #define INIT_CPU_TIMERS(s)						\
> > ...
> > That macro is only used in init_task.c Why not moving it there and get rid
> > of the whole macro maze in the header file?
> 
> The reason I didn't get rid of it is that it's got more than one expansion
> point.  Same for INIT_PREV_CPUTIME and INIT_PID_LINK.

Ah, sorry I missed that. So yes, the current patch is fine.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux