Re: [PATCH] bug.h: Work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] bug.h: Work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:38:21 -0800
- Cc: "linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mikael Starvik <starvik@xxxxxxxx>, "Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Christopher Li" <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, "linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-cris-kernel@xxxxxxxx" <linux-cris-kernel@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-sparse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-sparse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAK8P3a2fXQHCN7gqNL9j7AeZqy7NXAMW1bqyFJs3G1M_M4BQ4A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20171219114112.939391-1-arnd@arndb.de> <8e42a1de-f619-7a4e-6d58-f90f53f5f38f@synopsys.com> <CAK8P3a2fXQHCN7gqNL9j7AeZqy7NXAMW1bqyFJs3G1M_M4BQ4A@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
On 12/19/2017 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I suppose BUG() implies "dead end" like semantics - which ARC was lacking
before ?
Correct. Using __builtin_trap() here avoids the 'control reaches end of non-void
function' warnings, but then makes us run into the stack size problem that
I work around with the barrier_before_unreachable().
It would be good if you could give this a quick test to see if you get sensible
output from the __builtin_trap();
It does, added a BUG() arbit, hits an abort()
...
ISA Extn : atomic ll64 unalign (not used)
: mpy[opt 9] div_rem norm barrel-shift swap minmax swape
BPU : partial match, cache:2048, Predict Table:16384
BUG: failure at ../arch/arc/mm/tlb.c:827/arc_mmu_init()!
Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
FWIW newer ARC gcc actually implements the builtin so we get a trap 5 instruction
now, vs., abort() calls before.
BTW I missed reading the hunk of your changelog where this addresses the long
standing mystery with ARC builds and numerous -Wreturn-type warnings. I always
wondered why they were not fixed upstream already, being too lazy to investigate
myself, and turns out this was due to this BUG() thingy. phew !
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]