Does this break IA64 Linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Does this break IA64 Linux?
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:54:14 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <151274828931.9961.17801232134228415862.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References: <151274828931.9961.17801232134228415862.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <151274828194.9961.4230316917108602662.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Hi Tony, Fenghua,

Can you take a look at this patch and see if it breaks IA64?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does this break IA64 Linux?
  - From: David Howells
- RE: Does this break IA64 Linux?
  - From: Luck, Tony

References:
- [PATCH 1/5] Construct init thread stack in the linker script rather than by union
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 0/5] Consolidate init_task handling and expand macros
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: [PATCH 0/5] Consolidate init_task handling and expand macros
Next by Date: Adding init_task consolidation patches to linux-next
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/5] Construct init thread stack in the linker script rather than by union
Next by thread: RE: Does this break IA64 Linux?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux for Ham Radio]

Powered by Linux