Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers
- From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:31:17 +0900
- Cc: "'Sergey Senozhatsky'" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <b8b35299-cfce-c5dc-536d-b21a71187cc8@gmx.de>
- References: <20170916035347.19705-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170918174432.4fksyzco2g6gczwe@intel.com> <20170918183902.GA30752@p100.box> <20170919020537.GA16991@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD007A0D0@AcuExch.aculab.com> <a7a0f1f6-781b-eba3-9b81-69b979503990@gmx.de> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD007AF31@AcuExch.aculab.com> <b8b35299-cfce-c5dc-536d-b21a71187cc8@gmx.de>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02)
On (09/20/17 12:20), Helge Deller wrote:
[..]
> > I've not looked at the specifics case...
> >
> > Another option is using a struct with a single member and
> > passing it by value.
>
> Actually, we do already have correct structs which could be referenced:
> parisc: struct Elf64_Fdesc
> ia64: struct fdesc
> ppc64: struct ppc64_opd_entry
>
> One could "#define platform_opd_entry" to each of those depending on the platform and use it.
> It might be misleading though, because the pointer which is handed over to
> dereference_function_descriptor() can be such a pointer but isn't necessary.
> I'll leave it up to Sergey to decide.
Hello,
I think I'll keep 'unsigned long' for now.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]