Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-c6x-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-metag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cris-kernel@xxxxxxxx, freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:19:07 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20160712121625.GP23520@phenom.ffwll.local>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1467275019-30789-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160712121625.GP23520@phenom.ffwll.local>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
On 07/12/2016 02:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:23:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> This is fifth approach for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned
>> long.
>>
>> The main patch (1/44) doing the change is split into many subpatches
>> for easier review (2-42). They should be squashed together when
>> applying.
>
> For all the drm driver patches:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Should I pull these in through drm-misc, or do you prefer to merge them
> through a special topic branch (with everything else) instead on your own?
> -Daniel
Thanks. I saw today that Andrew Morton applied the patchset so I think
he will handle it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]