Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 5/6] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 5/6] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:43:48 +0200
- Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@xxxxxxx>, Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1465944489-43440-6-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1465944489-43440-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1465944489-43440-6-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:48:08PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> even the reduced maximum of about 16k (32-bit) or 1G (64-bit) should
> be more than enough for the foreseeable future.
So what happens if I manage to create 16k+ threads on my 32bit kernel
and get them all to do mmap() or so at the same time.
That doesn't seem too far fetched.
Then again, with double that (the current limit) that doesn't seem
impossible either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]