On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for AArch32 state")[...]David Daney (2): arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages. acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages. Hanjun Guo (11): acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug() acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk() x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to drivers/acpi/numa.c acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64 Robert Richter (1): acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 onlyI need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14].There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way.That would be 4.7 and 4.8 respectively I suppose? Anyway, Catalin has ACKed all of them except for the [13/14], so technically I can apply [1-12/14] now and then [13-14/14] can be applied when they are ready. Do you think there will be any problems with merging [6-7/14] into 4.7 via the ACPI tree?
I would defer to the arm64 maintainers for decisions about the arm64 specific parts of the patch set. That said, many of the arm64 specific patches depend on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so you would have to be careful about merge ordering if you pull these in before the for-next/core branch is merged.
Also FWIW, I plan on addressing Catalin's comments about 13/14 and posting a new version of the patch set in the next day or two.
Thanks for looking at these, David Daney -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |