Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:28:34 -0400
- Cc: linux acpi <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@xxxxxxx>, Sunil <sunil.vl@xxxxxxx>, Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>, Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>, X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAJvTdKnJPZ9Nfib=CqBczMP4BERqfqAzeSR-+jjFOGZR51oVmg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1462981062-24909-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1462981062-24909-2-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <CAJvTdKnJPZ9Nfib=CqBczMP4BERqfqAzeSR-+jjFOGZR51oVmg@mail.gmail.com>
What is the functional goal/purpose of adding CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE?
If the answer is that it saves code space on an ARM build, how much
space does it save?
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]