Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:53:49 +0200
- Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20160420134019.GX3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1460041951-22347-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <1460041951-22347-11-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20160413090829.GB29579@gmail.com> <20160413091625.GF14351@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160413091943.GA17858@gmail.com> <20160413102731.GA29896@gmail.com> <20160413124943.GH14351@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160420134019.GX3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:49:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 13-04-16 12:27:31, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm testing your patches today, if they are otherwise OK [...]
> > >
> > > got this build failure:
> > >
> > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h:106:2: error: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints
> >
> > Hmm, I have no idea why 64b didn't have problem with the asm but 32b
> > complains. Anyway, the following makes both happy. I have checked the
> > generated code for 64b and it hasn't changed after the patch. 32b also
> > seems to be generating a proper code. My gcc asm()-foo is rather weak so
> > I would feel better if somebody double checked after me.
>
> I completely blow at this gcc-asm constraints thing too :/
>
> In any case, Ingo will you look after the rest of these patches, or do
> you want me to pick up the remaining bits?
Yeah, it's on my list!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]