Re: [v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:27:11 +0100
- Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-metag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, user-mode-linux-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, adi-buildroot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx, will.deacon@xxxxxxx, james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <56945366.2090504@imgtec.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1452426622-4471-12-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <56945366.2090504@imgtec.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:14:14PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> This statement doesn't fit MIPS barriers variations. Moreover, there is a
> reason to extend that even more specific, at least for smp_store_release and
> smp_load_acquire, look into
>
> http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10506/
Dude, that's one horrible patch.
1) you do not make such things selectable; either the hardware needs
them or it doesn't. If it does you _must_ use them, however unlikely.
2) the changelog _completely_ fails to explain the sync 0x11 and sync
0x12 semantics nor does it provide a publicly accessible link to
documentation that does.
3) it really should have explained what you did with
smp_llsc_mb/smp_mb__before_llsc() in _detail_.
And I agree that ideally it should be split into parts.
Seriously, this is _NOT_ OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]