Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- From: Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:53:13 -0400
- Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-am33-list@xxxxxxxxxx, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, adi-buildroot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cris-kernel@xxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <55B25DDE.8090107@roeck-us.net>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1437508781-28655-1-git-send-email-emunson@akamai.com> <1437508781-28655-3-git-send-email-emunson@akamai.com> <20150721134441.d69e4e1099bd43e56835b3c5@linux-foundation.org> <1437528316.16792.7.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20150722141501.GA3203@akamai.com> <20150723065830.GA5919@linux-mips.org> <20150724143936.GE9203@akamai.com> <55B25DDE.8090107@roeck-us.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/24/2015 07:39 AM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:15:01AM -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>You haven't wired it up properly on powerpc, but I haven't mentioned it because
> >>>>I'd rather we did it.
> >>>>
> >>>>cheers
> >>>
> >>>It looks like I will be spinning a V5, so I will drop all but the x86
> >>>system calls additions in that version.
> >>
> >>The MIPS bits are looking good however, so
> >>
> >>Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>With my ack, will you keep them or maybe carry them as a separate patch?
> >
> >I will keep the MIPS additions as a separate patch in the series, though
> >I have dropped two of the new syscalls after some discussion. So I will
> >not include your ack on the new patch.
> >
> >Eric
> >
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> next-20150724 still has some failures due to this patch set. Are those
> being looked at (I know parisc builds fail, but there may be others) ?
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
Guenter,
Yes, the next respin will drop all new arch syscall entries except
x86[_64] and MIPS. I will leave it up to arch maintainers to add the
entries.
Eric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
- Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]