On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Convert pciehp to be builtin only, with no module option. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig >> index 569f82f..3b94cfc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig >> @@ -14,15 +14,12 @@ config PCIEPORTBUS >> # Include service Kconfig here >> # >> config HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE >> - tristate "PCI Express Hotplug driver" >> + bool "PCI Express Hotplug driver" >> depends on HOTPLUG_PCI && PCIEPORTBUS >> help >> Say Y here if you have a motherboard that supports PCI Express Native >> Hotplug >> >> - To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the >> - module will be called pciehp. >> - >> When in doubt, say N. >> >> source "drivers/pci/pcie/aer/Kconfig" >> > > Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi Bjorn, Looks like we lose the option to disable pciehp after we make it as built-in. Before acpiphp and pciehp could be compiled as modules, and user could blacklist to disable them. Now they are all built-in, but only acpiphp has acpiphp.disable to disable acpiphp. we don't have pciehp.disable yet. Do you think if we should add pciehp.disable ? BTW we don't have any description for acpiphp.disable anywhere. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|