On 2015/3/25 7:58, Daniel Axtens wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 11:34 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Now we could use pci_scan_host_bridge() to scan >> pci buses, provide powerpc specific pci_host_bridge_ops. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c >> index 2c58200..e2b50a2 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c >> @@ -773,6 +773,29 @@ void pcibios_set_root_bus_speed(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >> return ppc_md.pcibios_set_root_bus_speed(bridge); >> } >> >> +static int pci_host_scan_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *host) >> +{ >> + int mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL; >> + struct pci_bus *bus = host->bus; >> + struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_drvdata(&host->dev); > Is there any reason this isn't *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus)? Hi Daniel, thanks for your review and comments. We want to make a generic pci_host_bridge, which would hold the common host information, for example, pci domain is common info for pci host bridge, this series saved domain in pci_host_bridge, then we no need to extract out domain by pci_bus->sysdata by platform specific pci_domain_nr(). Also we store the sysdata in pci_host_bridge, and pci_bus_to_host() is the platform interface, I think use the common interface would be better. >> + >> + /* Get probe mode and perform scan */ >> + if (hose->dn && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode) >> + mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus); >> + >> + pr_debug(" probe mode: %d\n", mode); >> + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE) >> + of_scan_bus(hose->dn, bus); >> + >> + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL) { >> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, 255); >> + hose->last_busno = pci_scan_child_bus(bus); >> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, hose->last_busno); >> + } >> + >> + return pci_bus_child_max_busnr(bus); >> +} >> + > I'm having trouble convincing myself that this patch covers every > variation within our PCI implementations. In particular, there's a > stanza in of_scan_pci_bridge in kernel/pci_of_scan.c that's almost > identical to this function. Does that implementation need to be cleaned > up and replaced with this function too? > This is a pci_host_bridge_ops hook function, which would be called in PCI core, and after applied this series, we only need to call pci_scan_host_bridge() to scan pci devices, and this function is also extracted from the pcibios_scan_phb(), it's not the redundant code. > >> @@ -1641,9 +1655,9 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose) >> ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb(hose); >> >> /* Configure PCI Express settings */ >> - if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) { >> + if (host->bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) { >> struct pci_bus *child; >> - list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) >> + list_for_each_entry(child, &host->bus->children, node) >> pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); >> } >> } > Two things: Firstly, the function uses hose throughout, not host. > Secondly, you're not deleting the bus variable: what's the purpose of > this change? host is the common pci_host_bridge which is created by PCI core for pci host bridge driver, the hose is the platform data used in powerpc. The purpose of the patch/series is to simplify pci enumeration interface, and try to reduce the weak functions which were used to setup pci bus/devices during PCI enumeration. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |