Re: bit fields && data tearing

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/08/2014 12:09 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> Um, I think you need to re-read the thread; that's not what I said at
> all. It's even written lower down: "PA can't do atomic bit sets (no
> atomic RMW except the ldcw operation) it can do atomic writes to
> fundamental sizes (byte, short, int, long) provided gcc emits the
> correct primitive".  The original question was whether atomicity
> required native bus width access, which we currently assume, so there's
> no extant problem.
> 

The issue at hand was whether or not partially overlapped (but natually
aligned) writes can pass each other.  *This* is the aggressive
relaxation to which I am referring.

I would guess that that is a very unusual constraint.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html