RE: [PATCH v6 1/9] efi: Use early_mem*() instead of early_io*()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/9] efi: Use early_mem*() instead of early_io*()
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:56:09 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx" <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx" <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jeremy@xxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx" <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "eshelton@xxxxxxxxx" <eshelton@xxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20140623135446.GG28489@olila.local.net-space.pl>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1403299768-9955-1-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <1403299768-9955-2-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <53A7F104020000780001C4BE@mail.emea.novell.com> <20140623135446.GG28489@olila.local.net-space.pl>
- Thread-index: AQHPjurJMvi1kjppck6FTiWu5qFFH5uAjAbw
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v6 1/9] efi: Use early_mem*() instead of early_io*()
> I am CC'ing IA-64 guys.
The *_unmap() functions are no-op on ia64 - because we have mappings for everything all the time
- the *_map() functions just need to compute the proper address to use to get the right attributes
(so we don't mix and match cacheable and uncachable access to the same address). But there is
nothing to tear down afterwards.
I do tend to agree with Daniel that is seems odd to setup the mapping with one class of function
and then tear it down with another.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]