Re: [PATCH 4/9] ia64: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ia64: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 06:19:35 +0530
- Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, arvind.chauhan@xxxxxxx, robin.randhawa@xxxxxxx, Steve.Bannister@xxxxxxx, Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx, charles.garcia-tobin@xxxxxxx, cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linaro-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CA+8MBbLwxiPPvyKyQNEDSbNKthpAmooKVe7b+pg-NCETOkSLPA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <cover.1364229828.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <afc636963b63becccf34d092203c53369bd1b735.1364229828.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <CAKohponax2iDZeA-WG_L2XVHU5GGJB2nSPWVoVxbZUoez1ZpDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKohpokkyQK+650aPLtdXJ0wHWupR=-bcTM_eCoZRDy3N47HJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+8MBbLwxiPPvyKyQNEDSbNKthpAmooKVe7b+pg-NCETOkSLPA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2 April 2013 02:52, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [Repost in plain text so the lists don't bounce it - curse you Gmail
> for switching to HTML]
Just to let others know how you fixed it: Above the compose area there
is a small button (or whatever you call it) which can show "Rich Formatting"
or "plain text". Click on that so that it shows "Rich Formatting" all the time.
>> Any comments on this patch?
>
> This part looks OK ... But is there a big finish later in the patch series where
> you unify some/all of the cpufreq code across architectures? By
> itself just moving
> bits from arch/ia64/kernel/cpufreq to drivers/cpufreq/ doesn't look to add
> much value.
There are people (including me) who tried various times to get things fixed/
consolidated in cpufreq area. They mostly worked over cleaning up stuff inside
drivers/cpufreq area rather then looking at complete kernel. To make that
path easy, this patchset is the first step: "Bring all of them together"..
After this more consolidation work may follow which will span all
cpufreq drivers.
One aspect would be to use cpufreq-cpu0 for whatever platform we can.
For now, your Ack will work :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]