Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined
- From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:28:48 +0900
- Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx, liuj97@xxxxxxxxx, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, cl@xxxxxxxxx, minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx, kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <50DC3C26.6060308@cn.fujitsu.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1356350964-13437-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1356350964-13437-15-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <50DA7533.6060407@jp.fujitsu.com> <50DC3C26.6060308@cn.fujitsu.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
(2012/12/27 21:16), Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 12/26/2012 11:55 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki Wrote:
>> (2012/12/24 21:09), Tang Chen wrote:
>>> From: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> We call hotadd_new_pgdat() to allocate memory to store node_data. So we
>>> should free it when removing a node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I'm sorry but is it safe to remove pgdat ? All zone cache and zonelists are
>> properly cleared/rebuilded in synchronous way ? and No threads are visinting
>> zone in vmscan.c ?
>
> We have rebuilt zonelists when a zone has no memory after offlining some pages.
>
How do you guarantee that the address of pgdat/zone is not on stack of any kernel
threads or other kernel objects without reference counting or other syncing method ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]