(2011/07/07 6:14), Tony Luck wrote: > 2011/6/23 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> We plan to remove old obsolete cpumask functions and plan to >> change task->cpus_allowed implementation in future. > ... >> arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c | 56 +++++++++++++++--------------- > > I get some new warnings in this file with your patch: > > > arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c:454: warning: passing argument 2 of > ‘cpumask_set_cpu’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type > arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c:581: warning: passing argument 1 of > ‘cpumask_clear’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type > arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c:613: warning: passing argument 2 of > ‘cpumask_set_cpu’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type > arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c:637: warning: passing argument 2 of > ‘cpumask_set_cpu’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type > arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c:745: warning: passing argument 2 of > ‘cpumask_clear_cpu’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type > > Four of the five involve "cpu_callin_mask" which is "volatile", the other is for > "cpu_present_mask" - not sure what the problem is for this one. Sorry for the delay. I'm sorry for the annoying you. But ummm.. I can't understand the author expect which effect by this volatile. If I am correct, its volatile has no effect. we can simply remove it. So, I'll respin this. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html