Re: [PATCH] SGI Altix IA64 mmtimer: Eliminate long interval timer holdoffs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:42:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:39:41 -0500
> Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch for SGI Altix/IA64 eliminates interval long timer holdoffs in
> > cases where we don't start an interval timer before the expiration time.
> > This sometimes happens when a number of interval timers on the same shub
> > with the same interval run simultaneously.
> > 
> 
> Grumble.

Ditto.

> 
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/mmtimer.c	2010-10-07 09:34:29.837725250 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/mmtimer.c	2010-10-07 09:34:31.609948769 -0500
> > @@ -174,9 +174,8 @@ static void mmtimer_setup_int_2(int cpu,
> >   * in order to insure that the setup succeeds in a deterministic time frame.
> >   * It will check if the interrupt setup succeeded.
> >   */
> > -static int mmtimer_setup(int cpu, int comparator, unsigned long expires)
> > +static int mmtimer_setup(int cpu, int comparator, unsigned long expires, u64 *r)
> 
> Choosing a variable's identifier is your last chance to explain to the
> reader what that variable does.  And you blew it!

See the variable identifier in the attached patch.  Better?

> 
> >  
> > ...
> >
> > +static unsigned mmtimer_intrvl_retry_incr = MMTIMER_INTRVL_RETRY_INCR_DEFAULT;
> > +module_param(mmtimer_intrvl_retry_incr, uint, 0644);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mmtimer_intrvl_retry_incr,
> > +	"RTC ticks to add to expiration on interval retry (default 40)");
> 
> And the problem with abbreviations like "intrvl" is that they're hard
> to remember.  Which is why in the kernel we much prefer to use the
> entire English word.
> 

Again, see the variable names in the attached patch.

> 
> I'm unable to work out how important this patch is.  I'm presently
> assuming 2.6.37.

Good enough.
__________________


This patch for SGI Altix/IA64 eliminates interval long timer holdoffs in
cases where we don't start an interval timer before the expiration time.
This sometimes happens when a number of interval timers on the same shub
with the same interval run simultaneously.

Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@xxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/char/mmtimer.c |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/mmtimer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/mmtimer.c	2010-10-08 08:14:45.971073581 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/mmtimer.c	2010-10-08 08:14:49.027447493 -0500
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@ static void mmtimer_setup_int_2(int cpu,
  * in order to insure that the setup succeeds in a deterministic time frame.
  * It will check if the interrupt setup succeeded.
  */
-static int mmtimer_setup(int cpu, int comparator, unsigned long expires)
+static int mmtimer_setup(int cpu, int comparator, unsigned long expires,
+	u64 *set_completion_time)
 {
-
 	switch (comparator) {
 	case 0:
 		mmtimer_setup_int_0(cpu, expires);
@@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ static int mmtimer_setup(int cpu, int co
 		break;
 	}
 	/* We might've missed our expiration time */
-	if (rtc_time() <= expires)
+	*set_completion_time = rtc_time();
+	if (*set_completion_time <= expires)
 		return 1;
 
 	/*
@@ -225,6 +226,8 @@ static int mmtimer_disable_int(long nasi
 #define TIMER_OFF	0xbadcabLL	/* Timer is not setup */
 #define TIMER_SET	0		/* Comparator is set for this timer */
 
+#define MMTIMER_INTERVAL_RETRY_INCREMENT_DEFAULT 40
+
 /* There is one of these for each timer */
 struct mmtimer {
 	struct rb_node list;
@@ -240,6 +243,11 @@ struct mmtimer_node {
 };
 static struct mmtimer_node *timers;
 
+static unsigned mmtimer_interval_retry_increment =
+	MMTIMER_INTERVAL_RETRY_INCREMENT_DEFAULT;
+module_param(mmtimer_interval_retry_increment, uint, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(mmtimer_interval_retry_increment,
+	"RTC ticks to add to expiration on interval retry (default 40)");
 
 /*
  * Add a new mmtimer struct to the node's mmtimer list.
@@ -287,7 +295,8 @@ static void mmtimer_set_next_timer(int n
 	struct mmtimer_node *n = &timers[nodeid];
 	struct mmtimer *x;
 	struct k_itimer *t;
-	int o;
+	u64 expires, exp, set_completion_time;
+	int i;
 
 restart:
 	if (n->next == NULL)
@@ -298,7 +307,8 @@ restart:
 	if (!t->it.mmtimer.incr) {
 		/* Not an interval timer */
 		if (!mmtimer_setup(x->cpu, COMPARATOR,
-					t->it.mmtimer.expires)) {
+					t->it.mmtimer.expires,
+					&set_completion_time)) {
 			/* Late setup, fire now */
 			tasklet_schedule(&n->tasklet);
 		}
@@ -306,14 +316,23 @@ restart:
 	}
 
 	/* Interval timer */
-	o = 0;
-	while (!mmtimer_setup(x->cpu, COMPARATOR, t->it.mmtimer.expires)) {
-		unsigned long e, e1;
-		struct rb_node *next;
-		t->it.mmtimer.expires += t->it.mmtimer.incr << o;
-		t->it_overrun += 1 << o;
-		o++;
-		if (o > 20) {
+	i = 0;
+	expires = exp = t->it.mmtimer.expires;
+	while (!mmtimer_setup(x->cpu, COMPARATOR, expires,
+				&set_completion_time)) {
+		int to;
+
+		i++;
+		expires = set_completion_time +
+				mmtimer_interval_retry_increment + (1 << i);
+		/* Calculate overruns as we go. */
+		to = ((u64)(expires - exp) / t->it.mmtimer.incr);
+		if (to) {
+			t->it_overrun += to;
+			t->it.mmtimer.expires += t->it.mmtimer.incr * to;
+			exp = t->it.mmtimer.expires;
+		}
+		if (i > 20) {
 			printk(KERN_ALERT "mmtimer: cannot reschedule timer\n");
 			t->it.mmtimer.clock = TIMER_OFF;
 			n->next = rb_next(&x->list);
@@ -321,21 +340,6 @@ restart:
 			kfree(x);
 			goto restart;
 		}
-
-		e = t->it.mmtimer.expires;
-		next = rb_next(&x->list);
-
-		if (next == NULL)
-			continue;
-
-		e1 = rb_entry(next, struct mmtimer, list)->
-			timer->it.mmtimer.expires;
-		if (e > e1) {
-			n->next = next;
-			rb_erase(&x->list, &n->timer_head);
-			mmtimer_add_list(x);
-			goto restart;
-		}
 	}
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux