On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/Changes b/Documentation/Changes > index 4fb88f1..23fc499 100644 > --- a/Documentation/Changes > +++ b/Documentation/Changes > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ isdn4k-utils. > > o Gnu C 3.2 # gcc --version > o Gnu make 3.80 # make --version > -o binutils 2.12 # ld -v > +o binutils 2.12 (2.16 for ia64) # ld -v > o util-linux 2.10o # fdformat --version > o module-init-tools 0.9.10 # depmod -V > o e2fsprogs 1.41.4 # e2fsck -V Won't this file become a complete mess if each architecture starts specifying its own version for each of the tools? Is it likely that all the others will follow ia64's bold lead in moving past 2.12 for binutils? Overall this patch looks to be a good idea (oldest binutils on any of my systems is 2.17) ... so clearing out all the ancient tests for long-fixed bugs is nice. But I worry about being the trend setter here. -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|