Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Mike Travis wrote:

Tony: Can you confirm that the new percpu stuff works on IA64? (Or is
there nobody left to care?)
Christoph,  I have access to a 640p system for a couple more weeks if
there's anything you'd like me to check out.

Boot with 2.6.32 and see if the per cpu allocator works. Check if there
are any changes to memory consumption. Create a few thousand virtual
ethernet devices and see if the system keels over.

Any advice on how to go about the above would be helpful... ;-)


It may also be good to run some scheduler test. Compare AIM9 of latest
SLES with 2.6.32. Concurrent page fault test? Then a performance test with
lots of concurrency but the usual stuff wont work since HPC apps usually
pin.

I'm doing some aim7/9 comparisons right now between SPARSE and DISCONTIG
memory configs using sles11 + 2.6.32.  Which other benchmarks would you
recommend for the other tests?


Run latencytest (available in the lldiag package) from
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/lldiag and see how the
disturbances by the OS are changed.

I'll put that on the list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux