Hello, On 12/08/2009 05:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > According to Tejun the problem is just cosmetic (i.e. causes build > warnings), since the functions affected aren't being used (yet) on > ia64. So feel free to drop the patch again, given that he has a patch > queued to address the issue by renaming the arch variable. > > I wonder though why that code is being built on ia64 at all if it's not > being used (i.e. why it doesn't depend on a CONFIG_*, HAVE_*, or > NEED_* manifest constant). Hmm... it shouldn't be building. Can you please attach .config? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|