* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jiri Kosina wrote: > > pcpu_alloc() and pcpu_extend_area_map() perform a series of > > spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() calls, which make them unsafe > > with respect to being called from contexts which have IRQs off. > > > > This patch converts the code to perform save/restore of flags instead, > > making pcpu_alloc() (or __alloc_percpu() respectively) to be called > > from early kernel startup stage, where IRQs are off. > > > > This is needed for proper initialization of per-cpu rq_weight data from > > sched_init(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'll wait for response on the series and push it through percpu#fixes > tomorrow if there's no objection. Yep, the 2/2 sched.c patch looks good now: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|