Hello, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Still looks like a bug if it causes a breakage (linker error) on IA64, In a sense, yes. > and if the 'fix' (i'd call it a workaround) causes a (small but nonzero) > performance regression on other architectures. Yeah, by small amount but also reduces memory usage quite a bit. For this case, I think dynamic allocation is actually the right thing to do. Extending the first chunk size shouldn't be difficult on ia64 but other than this, there still is a lot of room left with the current 64k limit, so I think we should be safe for a while. BTW, I also am curious how lockdep has been coping with the limit. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |