Jiri Kosina wrote: > So how about something along the lines below? (completely untested as > well) > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > Subject: sched: move rq_weight data array out of .percpu > > Commit 34d76c41 introduced percpu array update_shares_data, size of which > being proportional to NR_CPUS. Unfortunately this blows up ia64 for large > NR_CPUS configuration, as ia64 allows only 64k for .percpu section. > > Fix this by allocating this array dynamically and keep only pointer to it > percpu. Looks good to me from percpu POV. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|