RE: [git pull] ia64 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Or did I miss something?

Never mind, it's all fine. It just depends on what you define "unlocked" 
to be, and "old value matches high bits is unlocked" is obviously the more 
attractive case than the one I was thinking of ("new value matches high 
bits"), since it makes a zero initializer be unlocked.

And it's what x86 does too. I don't know why I expected the "new value 
is the ticket" case.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux