On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:20:32 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2009 12:55:02 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> > > > > ... > > > > /* Make sure we keep the same behaviour */ > > static inline int dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr) > > { > > @@ -53,178 +55,6 @@ extern int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask); > > extern void *dma_generic_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, > > dma_addr_t *dma_addr, gfp_t flag); > > > > -static inline dma_addr_t > > -dma_map_single(struct device *hwdev, void *ptr, size_t size, > > - enum dma_data_direction dir) > > -{ > > - struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(hwdev); > > - dma_addr_t addr; > > - > > - kmemcheck_mark_initialized(ptr, size); > > This patch attempts to delete kmemcheck stuff which isn't presently in > linux-next. kmemcheck_mark stuff is in the tip tree (this patchset is against the tip tree). I rework on this patchset against -mm if you merge all the patches. > > So I went ahead and ported the patch, but it'll break if/when kmemcheck > returns. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |