Jes Sorensen wrote: > Roel Kluin wrote: >> lowest_free_index is unsigned, but in alloc_ate_resource() and >> free_ate_resource() it is treated as signed > > I don't thing it's a big issue to be honest, it just means the tests for > lowest_free_index < 0 are no-ops. I would be fine with a patch that > changes it to signed. Ok, How's this? If my changelog is not clear feel free to amend it. ------------------------------>8-------------8<--------------------------------- unsigned lowest_free_index was set in alloc_ate_resource() with the return value of find_free_ate(), which is -1 when no free ate is found. Since unsigned, a lowest_free_index of -1, `ate exhaustion', would then not be noticed in a subsequent call to alloc_ate_resource(). Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx> --- diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/sn/pcibr_provider.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/sn/pcibr_provider.h index da205b7..b3133ef 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/sn/pcibr_provider.h +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/sn/pcibr_provider.h @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct ate_resource{ u64 *ate; u64 num_ate; - u64 lowest_free_index; + int lowest_free_index; }; struct pcibus_info { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |