* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ingo, I think you ia64 stuff was broken. It used "vector" to get > > to the irq descriptor. Which is not the same as an "irq" at all. > > > > The reason I noticed is that it clashed with the ia64 pull, > > which had fixed this up. that's the fallout of: d2287f5: irq: update all arches for new irq_desc, fix it's this change: while (vector != IA64_SPURIOUS_INT_VECTOR) { + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(vector); + if (unlikely(IS_LOCAL_TLB_FLUSH(vector))) { smp_local_flush_tlb(); - kstat_this_cpu.irqs[vector]++; + kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(vector, desc); } else if (unlikely(IS_RESCHEDULE(vector))) - kstat_this_cpu.irqs[vector]++; + kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(vector, desc); and the original code addressed kstat-irqs (which was a [NR_IRQS] array) via 'vector'. And i think you are right that there is an irq<->vector mismatch here. I also think that ia64's use of [vector] there was probably buggy to begin with - the kstat array is really addressed by 'irq'. With the irq_to_desc() change we did above it became even more incorrect. It didnt crash though: this commit has been in linux-next for 2 months. Maybe nobody noticed because it's "just" about IRQ statistics? I have no ia64 box to check though, and the code in arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S looks rather cryptic. > > > > I tried to fix it all up. But I'm just about the last person in > > the universe who wants to compile ia64, so I have not tested, or > > even been able to see that it compiles. Somebody should > > double-check it. > > Sure, i'm on it, i'll check your resolution of > arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c. Your version builds fine on ia64 defconfig - and i think the resolution you did is correct. Detail: i _think_ you could have picked the ia64-branch version instead of doing a manual resolution - i.e. could have kept the ia64 version via the patch below. The reason is that IA64 does not support SPARSE_IRQ yet. But your resolution is cleaner and sparseirq-correct. Ingo diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c index acc4d19..977a6ef 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c @@ -493,15 +493,16 @@ ia64_handle_irq (ia64_vector vector, struct pt_regs *regs) saved_tpr = ia64_getreg(_IA64_REG_CR_TPR); ia64_srlz_d(); while (vector != IA64_SPURIOUS_INT_VECTOR) { + struct irq_desc *desc; int irq = local_vector_to_irq(vector); - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); + desc = irq_desc + irq; if (unlikely(IS_LOCAL_TLB_FLUSH(vector))) { smp_local_flush_tlb(); kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc); - } else if (unlikely(IS_RESCHEDULE(vector))) { + } else if (unlikely(IS_RESCHEDULE(vector))) kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc); - } else { + else { ia64_setreg(_IA64_REG_CR_TPR, vector); ia64_srlz_d(); @@ -552,15 +553,16 @@ void ia64_process_pending_intr(void) * Perform normal interrupt style processing */ while (vector != IA64_SPURIOUS_INT_VECTOR) { + struct irq_desc *desc; int irq = local_vector_to_irq(vector); - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); + desc = irq_desc + irq; if (unlikely(IS_LOCAL_TLB_FLUSH(vector))) { smp_local_flush_tlb(); kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc); - } else if (unlikely(IS_RESCHEDULE(vector))) { + } else if (unlikely(IS_RESCHEDULE(vector))) kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc); - } else { + else { struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(NULL); ia64_setreg(_IA64_REG_CR_TPR, vector); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |