On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:34 +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote: > > c b/kernel/spinlock.c > > index 29ab207..f769d8a 100644 > > --- a/kernel/spinlock.c > > +++ b/kernel/spinlock.c > > @@ -121,7 +121,11 @@ unsigned long __lockfunc _read_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock) > > local_irq_save(flags); > > preempt_disable(); > > rwlock_acquire_read(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP > > LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, _raw_read_trylock, _raw_read_lock); > > +#else > > + _raw_read_lock_flags(lock, &flags); > > +#endif > > return flags; > > } > > That should be CONFIG_LOCK_STAT. Ugh. Fine with me, but is CONFIG_LOCKDEP correct in _spin_lock_irqsave, or should it also read CONFIG_LOCK_STAT? > But aside from that, I really don't like this change, I'd rather you'd > create a LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS() that can deal with this. No problem. I could then also use it for _spin_lock_irqsave, if the answer to the above question is use CONFIG_LOCK_STAT there as well. Petr Tesarik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|