On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Not sure if this is helpful, but google pointed me at: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx/msg116574.html > > That said "Fixed in 4.0.0" ... so I grabbed and built a newer > gcc (4.2.4) and lo and behold the next-20080821 tag builds > and boots just fine[*] with it. > > Still need to figure out exactly what broke the build with > a 3.x gcc to see if there is an easy workaround. Though 4.0.0 > was released over three years ago ... is it time to give up > on the ancient 3.x technology? > > -Tony > > [*] If you ignore that the 4.2.4 compiler is about 15% slower > than my trusty old 3.4.6 :-( I have been doing a bisect using akpm's compiler to see if I can find the individual commit. Unfortunately, my laptop isn't the fastest build machine in the world. I did objdump the built-in.o and there is no such symbol in that file. 'strings' agrees. Thanks, Robin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|