On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:33:06AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: > Check linux-next, I believe the exact same fix is in there. Apparently, > as Stephen and others have pointed out earlier, that syntax isn't evaluated > correctly in earlier gcc's (at least earlier then the 4. series). Thanks, confirmed. dde108a23e4bf6d6d225ae18c64abeaf85fe2b50 in linux-next includes the same fix that I stumbled upon. -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|