On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:47:41PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi All, > > > > How does following series of patches look like. I have moved > > elfcorehdr_addr out of vmcore.c and pushed it to arch dependent section > > of crash dump to make sure that it can be worked with even when > > CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE is disabled and CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is enabled. > > > > I tested it on x86_64. Compile tested it on i386 and ppc64. ia64 and > > sh versions are completely untested. > > Given the current state of the code: > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To process a kernel crash dump we pass the kernel elfcorehdr option, > so testing to see if it was passed seems reasonable. > > In general I think this method of handling the problems with kdump is > too brittle to live, but in the case of iommus we certainly need to do > something different, and unfortunately iommus were not common on x86 > when the original code was merged so we have not handled them well. Agreed, however these patches look like they really ought to be merged into a single patch for the sake of bisect. As things stand, applying the first patch will break the build on each architecture with an architecture specific until the latter is applied. -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|