On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 10:40 +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 00:47 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > Hi Tony-san, > > > > > > > This surely is a bug. I bet this was introduced by Hidetoshi's latest > > > > > commit: > > > > > > > > > > commit 38477ad75188b2a7370fef7145f956e6c446928b > > > > > Author: Hidetoshi Seto > > > > > Date: Mon Apr 21 14:34:39 2008 -0700 > > > > > > > > > > [IA64] disable interrupts on exit of ia64_trace_syscall > > > > > > > > Can you try reverting this patch and re-running the > > > > same stress tests? > > > > > > OK, I'll try it at head of next week. > > > > Hmmm, > > if I am not stupid, I think 2.6.25-mm1 doesn't contain this patch. > > I am very confusing now... > > You're right, this patch is not present in -mm1. I'm sorry for the > noise. > > > and, I found easy reproduce way. > > that is > > > > % pstack $$ > > > > Can you reproduce it? > > Thank you for isolating the test case! > > I tried SUSE Factory, which is a 2.6.25 (and was readily available to > me), and I could not reproduce it. I used gstack from gdb 6.6, because I > couldn't find a true pstack for Linux. I'm now compiling -mm1 to see if > it makes any difference. I can also try on a larger machine (the testing > one is a real small Altix 350 with 2 cores). Unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce the bug you're seeing. Maybe it depends on a specific config option..? Petr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|