On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:11:11 +0200 "stephane eranian" <eranian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, > > It's http://perfmon2.sf.net > > hummmmm, I wonder why perfmon wants to reimplement half of the PCI layer... +extern spinlock_t pci_config_lock; + +#define PCI_CONF1_ADDRESS(bus, devfn, reg) \ + (0x80000000 | ((reg & 0xF00) << 16) | ((bus & 0xFF) << 16) \ + | (devfn << 8) | (reg & 0xFC)) + +#define is_ibs_pmc(x) (x == 4 || x == 5) + +static int pci_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) +{ + unsigned long flags; especially since this doesn't seem to use the proper config space abstractions :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |