On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:11:11 +0200
"stephane eranian" <eranian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> It's http://perfmon2.sf.net
>
>
hummmmm, I wonder why perfmon wants to reimplement half of the PCI layer...
+extern spinlock_t pci_config_lock;
+
+#define PCI_CONF1_ADDRESS(bus, devfn, reg) \
+ (0x80000000 | ((reg & 0xF00) << 16) | ((bus & 0xFF) << 16) \
+ | (devfn << 8) | (reg & 0xFC))
+
+#define is_ibs_pmc(x) (x == 4 || x == 5)
+
+static int pci_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
especially since this doesn't seem to use the proper config space abstractions :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|