Re: ptrace problem with 2.6.25 on Itanium

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 14:14 +0200, stephane eranian wrote:
> Petr,
> 
> Thanks for checking, I am pretty sure this is a problem introduced recently.
> The only thing related to this that I can think of is the TIF_RESTORE_RSE
> and the associated TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.
> 
> When I try the same test on 2.6.25:

Yes, this is consistent with what I can see on 2.6.25-rc3 (which I still
had lying around on the test host):

glass:~/ptrace-wrong-notify # ./task_ptrace_attach ./forktest 10 10
creating 10 additional process(es)
10 iterations
pid=3006 errno=0 exited=0 stopped=1 signaled=0 stopsig=19
SIGSTOP from [3006]
pid=3006 errno=0 exited=1 stopped=0 signaled=0 stopsig=0
EXITED [3006]
pid=3005 errno=0 exited=0 stopped=1 signaled=0 stopsig=5
FORK new_pid [3006]

and so on... Ok, I'm going to play with git now. ;]

Petr Tesarik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux