Re: [PATCH 1/2] HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:45:32 +0100
- Cc: "Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, miles@xxxxxxx, rmk+linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20080329031146.6FF7126FA1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <20080329001230.D013726FA1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080329001341.7F93826FA1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803281746480.14670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080329022408.0DD4726FA1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080329031146.6FF7126FA1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 20:11 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Change all the #ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK conditionals in non-arch
> code to #ifdef HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK.
That ifdef was only supposed to be a temporary thing until all
architectures had implemented TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK anyway.
It looks like only ARM, v850 and m68k which are still missing it; if
those three architectures can catch up, then hopefully it can die off
completely quite soon.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
