On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:03:36AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:05:17PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote: > > Gah, who ever came up with that syntax. Yep, thats a falsie. Should be > fixed in the latest version: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-next > > Thanks for the report. You're welcome and thanks for the quick fix to checkpatch.pl. I used the new version and it fixed the problem except for ones that were of the following form: enum xp_retval (*xp_set_amo_with_interrupt) (u64 *amo_va, int op, u64 operand, int remote, int nasid, int phys_cpuid, int vector); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xp_set_amo_with_interrupt); which still generated the false positive: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable #70: FILE: misc/xp/xp_main.c:70: +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xp_set_amo_with_interrupt); Thanks, Dean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |