From: John Marvin <jsm@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:16:00 -0600 > 1) There was no easy way of determining what size the long format vhpt cache > should be automatically, and changing it dynamically would be too painful. > Different workloads performed better with different size vhpt caches. This is exactly what sparc64 does btw, dynamic TLB miss hash table sizing based upon task RSS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|