Hi if revert following patch [IA64] Multiple outstanding ptc.g instruction support then this problem doesn't reproduce. I attached that revert patch. Thanks! > Hi > > I found strange message at 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 booting. > and it is always reproduce. > > and, Eric Piel's spinlock related patch(below URL) can't fixed my problem. > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561027011749&w=2 > > Is this known bug? > or should i do bisect? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#3, udevd/2495 > lock: a040000058246510, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: udevd/2495, .owner_cpu: 2 > > Call Trace: > [<a000000100015f00>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > sp=e00001609262fbd0 bsp=e000016092620fd8 > [<a000000100015f50>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620fc0 > [<a0000001004674a0>] spin_bug+0x1a0/0x1c0 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f90 > [<a000000100467590>] _raw_spin_unlock+0xd0/0x120 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f60 > [<a00000010082bfe0>] _spin_unlock+0x20/0x40 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f40 > [<a000000100138100>] do_wp_page+0x500/0xfe0 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620ed8 > [<a00000010013c560>] handle_mm_fault+0xe80/0x10e0 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620e50 > [<a00000010006c140>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x600/0xa40 > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620df0 > [<a00000010000abe0>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x270 > sp=e00001609262fe30 bsp=e000016092620df0
Attachment:
revert-PALO.patch
Description: Binary data
![]() |