RE: paravirt_ops support in IA64
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: paravirt_ops support in IA64
- From: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:52:30 +0800
- Cc: "xen-ia64-devel" <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Avi Kivity" <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@xxxxxxx>, "Robin Holt" <holt@xxxxxxx>, "Jack Steiner" <steiner@xxxxxxx>, <kvm-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02C8234B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02C8234B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: Achx3luJl0HVlxqjS/iVZ45epgB/kQAAqHNg
- Thread-topic: paravirt_ops support in IA64
Dong, Eddie wrote:
>
> In X86, there are another enhancement (dynamic patching) base on
> pv_ops. The purpose is to improve cpu predication by converting
> indriect function call to direct function call for both C & ASM code.
> We may take similar approach some time later too.
>
> We really need advices from community before we jump into
coding.
> CC some active members that I though may be interested in pv_ops
> since KVM-IA64 mailinglist doesn;t exist yet.
Hi, Eddie
we just created the kvm-ia64-devel mailing list, and cc to the guys from
this list who maybe interested in this topic.
If you or other guys who are interested in kvm-ia64-devel or pv_virt_ops
for ia64, please subscribe it here
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Lists%2C_IRC
Xiantao
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]